Self Directed Investor Inc
SDI: "Empowering investors with ideas and education"
Symbol Lookup »  

  • Other news: News from PR Newswire
| More

Volatility During Crises

Fri, Dec 21, 10:32 AM ET, by Bill Luby

[The following first appeared in the August 2011 edition of Expiring Monthly: The Option Traders Journal. I thought I would share it because it might help some readers put the current fiscal cliff crisis in historical context.]

The events of the last three weeks are a reminder that financial crises and stock market volatility can appear almost instantaneously and mushroom out of control before some investors even have a chance to ask what is happening. A case in point: on August 3rd investors were breathing a sigh of relief after the United States had finalized an agreement to raise the debt ceiling; at that time, the VIX stood at 23.38, reflecting a relative sense of calm, yet just three days later, the VIX jumped to 48.00 as two new crises displaced the debt ceiling issue.

Spanning the globe from Northern Africa, Japan, Europe and the United States, 2011 has seen no shortage of crises in the first eight months of the year. Given this pervasive crisis atmosphere, it is reasonable for investors to consider how much volatility they should anticipate during a crisis. In this article I will attempt to put crises and volatility in some historical perspective and address a variety of factors that affect the magnitude and duration of volatility during a crisis, drawing upon fundamental, technical and psychological causes.

Volatility in the Twentieth Century

Every generation likes to think that the issues of their time are more daunting and more complex than those faced by prior generations. No doubt investors fall prey to this kind of thinking as well. With a highly interconnected global economy, a news cycle that races around the globe at the speed of light and high-frequency and algorithmic trading systems that have transferred the task of trading from humans to machines, there is a lot to be said for the current batch of concerns. Looking at just the first half of the twentieth century, however, investors had to cope with the Great Depression, two world wars and the dawn of the nuclear age.

Given that the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) was not launched until 1993, any evaluation of the volatility component of various crises prior to the VIX must rely on measures of historical volatility (HV) rather than implied volatility. As the S&P 500 index on which the VIX is based only dates back to 1957, I have elected to use historical data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average dating back to before the Great Depression. In Figure 1 below, I have collected peak 20-day historical volatility readings for selected crises from 1929 to the present.

Before studying the table, readers may wish to perform a quick exercise by making a mental list of some of the events of the 20th century that constituted immediate or deferred threats to the United States, then compare the magnitude of that threat with the peak historical volatility observed in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. If you are like most historians and investors, after looking at the data you will probably conclude that the magnitude of the crisis and the magnitude of the stock market volatility have at best a very weak correlation.

[source(s): Yahoo]

Any ranking of crises in which the Cuban Missile Crisis and the attack on Pearl Harbor rank in the lower half of the list is certain to raise some eyebrows. Frankly I would have been surprised if even one of these events failed to trigger a historical volatility reading of 25, but seeing that was the case for half the crises on this list certainly provides a fair amount of food for thought.

Volatility in the VIX Era

With the launch of the VIX it became possible not only to evaluate historical volatility, but implied volatility as well. With only 18 years of data to draw upon, there is a limited universe of crises to examine, so in the table in Figures 2 below, I have highlighted the seven crises in the VIX era in which intraday volatility has reached at least 48. Additionally, I have included five other crises with smaller VIX spikes for comparison purposes.

[source(s): CBOE, Yahoo]

[Some brief explanatory notes will probably make the data easier to interpret. First, the crises are ranked by maximum VIX value, with the maximum historical volatility in an adjacent column for an easy comparison. The column immediately to the right of the MAX HV data captures the number of days from the peak VIX reading to the maximum 20-day HV reading, with negative numbers (LTCM and Y2K) indicating that HV peaked before the VIX did. The VIX vs. HV column calculates the amount in percentage terms that the peak VIX exceeded the peak HV. The VIX>10%10d" column reflects how many days transpired from the first VIX close above its 10-day moving average to the peak VIX reading. The SPX Drawdown column calculates the maximum peak to trough drawdown in the S&P 500 index during the crisis period, not from any pre-crisis peak. The VIX:SPX drawdown ratio calculates the percentage change in the VIX from the SPX crisis high to the SPX crisis low relative the percentage change in the SPX during the same period (of course these are not necessarily the VIX highs and lows during the period.) The SPX low relative to the 200-day moving average is the maximum amount the SPX fell below its 200-day moving average during the crisis. Finally, the last two columns capture the number of consecutive days the VIX closed at or above 30 during the crisis and the number of days the SPX closed at least 4% above or below the previous day's close during the crisis.]

Looking at the VIX era numbers, it is not surprising that the financial crisis of 2008 dominates in many of the categories. Reading across the rows, one can get an interesting cross-section of each crisis in terms of various volatility metrics, but I think some of the more interesting analysis comes from examining the columns, where we can learn something not just about the nature of the crises, but also about volatility as well. One important caveat is that the limited number of data points does not allow for this to be a statistically valid sample, but that does not preclude the possibility of drawing some potentially valuable and actionable conclusions.

Looking at the peak VIX reading relative to the peak HV reading I note that in all instances the VIX was ultimately higher than the maximum 20-day historical volatility reading. In the five lesser crises, the VIX was generally 50-80% higher than peak HV. In the seven major crises, not surprisingly HV did approach the VIX in several instances, but in the case of the 9/11 attack and the 2010 European sovereign debt crisis the VIX readings grossly overestimated future realized volatility.

One of my hypotheses about the time between the first VIX close above its 10-day moving average and the ultimate maximum VIX reading was that the longer the period between the initial VIX breakout and the maximum VIX, the higher the VIX spike would be. In this case the Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) and 2008 crises support the hypothesis, but the data is spotty elsewhere. The current European debt crisis, Asian Currency Crisis of 1997 and 9/11 attack all reflect a very rapid escalation of the VIX to its crisis high. In the case of the May 2010 'Flash Crash' and the Fukushima Nuclear Meltdown, the maximum VIX reading happened just one day after the initial VIX breakout. As many traders use the level of the VIX relative to its 10-day moving averages as a trading trigger, the data in this column could be of assistance to those looking to fine-tune entries or better understand the time component of the risk management equation.

Turing to the SPX drawdown data, the Asian Currency Crisis stands out as one instance where the VIX spike seems in retrospect to be out of proportion to the SPX peak to trough drawdown during the crisis. On the other side of the ledger, the drawdown during the Dotcom Crash appears to be consistent with a much higher VIX reading. Here the fact that it took some 2 ½ years for stocks to find a bottom meant that when the market finally bottomed, investors were somewhat desensitized and some of the fear and panic had already left the market, which is similar to what happened at the time of the March 2009 bottom. Note that the median VIX:SPX drawdown ratio for all twelve crises is 10.0, which is about 2 ½ times the movement in the VIX that one would expect during more normal market conditions.

The data for the SPX Low vs. 200-day Moving Average is similar to that of the SPX drawdown. For the most part, any drawdown of 10% or more is likely to take the index below its 200-day moving average. In the seven major crises profiled above, all but the Asian Currency Crisis dragged the index below its 200-day moving average; on the other hand, in all but one of the lesser crises the SPX never dropped below its 200-day moving average. Based on this data at least, one might be inclined to include the 200-day moving average breach as one aspect which helps to differentiate between major and minor crises.

As I see it, the last two columns - consecutive days of VIX closes over 30 and number of days in which the SPX has a 4% move - are central to the essence of the crisis volatility equation. Since the dawn of the VIX, the SPX has experienced a 2% move in about 80% of its calendar years, the VIX has spiked over 30 about 60% of the years, and the SPX has seen at least one 4% move in about 40% of those years. Those 4% moves are rare enough so that they almost always occur in the context of some sort of major crisis. In fact, one could argue that a 4% move in the SPX is a necessary condition for a financial crisis and/or a significant volatility event.

Fundamental, Technical and Psychological Factors in Crisis Volatility

Crises have many different causes. In the pre-VIX era, we saw a mix of geopolitical crises and stock market crashes, where the driving forces were largely fundamental ones. During the VIX era, I would argue that technical and psychological factors become increasingly important. The rise of quantitative trading has given birth to algorithmic trading, high-frequency trading and related approaches which place more emphasis on technical data than fundamental data. At the same time, retail investing has been revolutionized by a new class of online traders and the concomitant explosion in self-directed traders. This increased activity at the retail level has added a new layer of psychology to the market.

In terms of fundamental factors, one could easily argue that the top nine VIX spikes from the list of VIX era crises all arise from just two meta-crises, whose causes and imperfect resolution has created an interconnectedness in which subsequent crises are to a large extent just downstream manifestations of the ripple effect of the original crisis.

The first example of the meta-crisis effect was the 1997 Asian Currency Crisis, which migrated to Russia in the form of the 1998 Russian Ruble Crisis, which played a major role in the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management.

The second example of meta-crisis ripples begins with the Dotcom Crash and the efforts of Alan Greenspan to stimulate the economy with ultra-low interest rates. From here it is easy to draw a direct line of causation to the housing bubble, the collapse of Bear Stearns, the 2008 Financial Crisis and the recurring European Sovereign Debt Crisis. In each case, the remedial action for one crisis helped to sow the seeds for the next crisis.

In addition to the fundamental interconnectedness of these recent crises, it is also worth noting that the lower volatility crises were largely point or one-time-only events. There was, for instance, only one Hurricane Katrina, one turn of the clock for Y2K and one earthquake plus tsunami in Japan. As a result, the volatility associated with these events was compressed in time and accordingly the contagion potential was limited. By contrast, the major volatility events are more accurately thought of as systemic threats that ebbed and flowed over the course of an extended period, typically with multiple volatility spikes. In the same vein, the attempted resolution of these events generally included a complex government policy cocktail, whose effects were gradual and of largely indeterminate effectiveness.

Apart from the fundamental thread running through these crises, I also believe there is a psychological thread that sometimes spans multiple crises. Specifically, I am referring to the shadow that one crisis casts on future crises that follow it closely in time. I call this phenomenon 'disaster imprinting' and psychologists characterize something similar as availability bias. Simply stated, disaster imprinting refers to a phenomenon in which the threats of financial and psychological disaster are so severe that they leave a permanent or semi-permanent scar in one's psyche. Another way to describe disaster imprinting might be to liken it to a low-level financial post-traumatic stress disorder. Following the 2008 Financial Crisis, most investors were prone to overestimating future risk, which is why the VIX was consistently much higher than realized volatility in 2009 and 2010.

While it is impossible to prove, my sense is that if the events of 2008 were not imprinted in the minds of investors, the current crisis atmosphere might be characterized by a much lower degree of volatility and anxiety.


As this goes to press, the current volatility storm is drawing energy from concerns about the European Sovereign Debt Crisis as well as fears of a slowdown in global economic activity. The rise in volatility has coincided with a swift and violent selloff in stocks that has seen six days in which the S&P 500 index has moved at least 4% either up or down - a rate that is unprecedented outside of the 2008 Financial Crisis.

Ultimately, the severity of a volatility storm is a function of both the magnitude and the duration of the crisis, as well as the risk of contagion to other geographies, sectors and institutions. Act I of the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, in which Greece played the starring role, can trace its origins back to December 2009. In the intervening period, it has spread across Europe and has sent shockwaves across the globe.

By historical standards the volatility aspect of the current crisis is more severe than at any time during World War II, the Cuban Missile Crisis and just about any crisis other than the Great Depression, Black Monday of 1987 and the 2008 Financial Crisis.

In the data and commentary above, I have attempted to establish some historical context for volatility during various crises extending back to 1929 and in the process give investors some metrics for evaluating current and future volatility spikes. In addition, it is my hope that concepts such as meta-crises and disaster imprinting can help to bolster the interpretive framework for investors who are seeking a deeper understanding of volatility storms and the crises from which they arise.

Related posts:

Disclosure(s): none

SDI Glossary: "CBOE" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Debt" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Option" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Short" Definition
SDI Glossary: "VIX" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Volatility Index " Definition
This Article's Word Cloud:   Crisis   European   Volatility   about   above   average   below   case   column   crises   crisis   current   data   days   disaster   drawdown   during   events   financial   first   from   fundamental   have   historical   index   investors   just   least   major   market   maximum   more   moving   number   only   peak   period   reading   some   than   that   these   this   time   trading   volatility   were   which   with   would

| More

SPX 1, 2 and 3-Year Returns Following Top and Bottom Five (and Ten) VIX Average Annual Readings
Tue, Feb 21, 8:11 AM ET, by Bill Luby

On Saturday, I posted Putting Low Stock Volatility to Good Use (Guest Columnist at Barron's) ...

Putting Low Stock Volatility to Good Use (Guest Columnist at Barron's)
Sat, Feb 18, 5:21 PM ET, by Bill Luby

With spring training just getting underway in Florida and Arizona, I think it is appropriate ...

March Class Special: Detecting Tradable Setups and Reliable Signals with Corey
Thu, Feb 16, 12:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

I’m excited to announce an upcoming full-month of classes and actionable trader education for you ...

We Forgot what a Pullback Was Market Update Feb 16
Thu, Feb 16, 11:11 AM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Wait – what is this? Price can actually go DOWN? After the last five days, ...

Bulls Still Dominate the Highs Feb 15
Wed, Feb 15, 1:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The uptrend continues! And continues… and continues. And still continues even after yesterday’s pullback. ...

Six Stellar Stocks Shooting Straight Up Nine Days in a Row
Tue, Feb 14, 8:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

When we scan for stocks, we like to find “strong stocks getting stronger.” One way ...

Market Internals and the New Pullback from the Highs Feb 14
Tue, Feb 14, 11:41 AM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The uptrend continues! And continues… and continues. Until today’s pullback at least. ...

New Introduction to the Wave Principle Video
Fri, Feb 10, 5:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

If you’ve never heard of the Elliott Wave Principle, or want a quick intro-level refresher, ...

Time for a Longer Timeframe Bounce for Coca Cola KO
Fri, Feb 10, 10:11 AM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Let’s see if buyers can take advantage of a long term rising trendline for Coca-Cola ...

Tesla TSLA Surges with Market on Break to New Highs (but Watch the Weekly Chart)
Thu, Feb 9, 3:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Tesla (TSLA) shares continued their strong uptrend, breaking out to a new swing high this ...

Breaking Out to New Highs Feb 9
Thu, Feb 9, 12:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The uptrend continues! And continues… and continues. Today we’re seeing another breakout to new highs ...

Gilead Sciences GILD Collapses to Keep Steep Downtrend in Motion
Wed, Feb 8, 4:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

“Strong Stocks Keep Getting Stronger while Weak Stocks Keep Getting Weaker.” Gilead Sciences reminds us ...

Keeping the Range Going at the Highs Feb 8
Wed, Feb 8, 12:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

We’re seeing a series of small ranges develop in the @ES Emini. Today gave us ...

Pullback Planning for Disney DIS Ahead of Earnings
Tue, Feb 7, 3:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Disney (DIS) reports earnings after the closing bell today. Let’s study the set-up – a ...

Strong Stock Getting Stronger NVDA Rallies its Way Back to the Highs
Mon, Feb 6, 1:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Each week for members, I publish the results of a “Strong Stock Getting Stronger” stock ...

After a Nice Bear Flag BIDU Triggers a Bull Flag Breakout
Mon, Feb 6, 12:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

If you like trading Bull and Bear Flags as I do, you’ll probably want to ...

Emini Pulling Back from the Highs Trade Planning Feb 6
Mon, Feb 6, 12:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Last week’s breakout sent the market back toward the prior high. However, this morning we’re ...

Market Surging Back to the Highs Update Feb 3
Fri, Feb 3, 12:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Jobs Jobs Jobs! A positive reaction to this morning’s monthly Jobs Report sent the market ...

Bouncing Between the New Range Emini Update Feb 2
Thu, Feb 2, 12:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The range is back! And we didn’t miss it at all. We’re seeing price bounce ...

Apple AAPL Appears Back at the Highs Feb 1
Wed, Feb 1, 1:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Just like that, Apple (AAPL) shares surged toward the price highs of early 2016. Will ...

February Fed Day Fibonacci Bouncing Update Feb 1
Wed, Feb 1, 12:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

We’re using two Fibonacci Grids for planning trades in the intraday Emini as noted. Price ...

Day Two of Market Crashing to Support Jan 31
Tue, Jan 31, 12:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

From the negative divergences in an overextended market, a pullback was precisely the expected future. ...

Swinging Toward and Away from the 20 Day EMA
Mon, Jan 30, 3:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

When setting up your trades, it’s helpful to put them within the context of the ...

Crash Goes the Market to Lower Targets Jan 30
Mon, Jan 30, 1:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

From the negative divergences in an overextended market, a pullback was precisely the expected future. ...

Four Market Money Flow during the Stock Market Surge Jan 27
Fri, Jan 27, 2:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

We know that US Stocks surged to new all-time highs this week as the Dow ...

Pullback in Progress Market Update Jan 27
Fri, Jan 27, 12:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Down from the highs we go! At least temporarily. Yesterday we looked at our negative ...

Stepping Inside the Breakout with Internals Update Jan 25
Thu, Jan 26, 12:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

How high will this breakout travel? Let’s take a moment to look beneath price to ...

The Breakout is Finally Happening Jan 25 Update
Wed, Jan 25, 11:21 AM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The market just became exciting again! After a month in a well-defined sideways trading range, ...

Comparing Creeper Uptrends Intraday Jan 24
Tue, Jan 24, 1:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Nobody wants to be a “Creeper” but as traders we certainty do enjoy “creeper” intraday ...

From the Low to the High of the Trading Range Jan 24
Tue, Jan 24, 12:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Trading the market is extraordinary easy right now – buy when price touches the lower ...

The Range is All that Matters Right Now Jan 23
Mon, Jan 23, 12:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Stop what you’re doing and look at the trading range. Now. ...

Pondering a Perfect Pattern Repeat for Market at the Highs
Fri, Jan 20, 1:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

A major part of technical analysis (charting) is identifying prior patterns – and their outcomes ...

This is a Very Tight Range for Traders Emini Jan 20
Fri, Jan 20, 1:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Stop what you’re doing and look at the trading range. Take off all indicators and ...

No Breakout Not Today Emini Trading Update Jan 19
Thu, Jan 19, 12:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

My heart goes out to you if you excitedly decided 2017 was the year you ...

High Flying Financial Goldman Sachs GS Falls from the Highs
Wed, Jan 18, 1:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Stocks that are high-flyers run the risk of crashing back to earth. Goldman Sachs (GS) ...

Range Range Here to Stay Emini Update Jan 18
Wed, Jan 18, 1:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

If you’re ready for this trading range at the highs to end, you’re not alone. ...

Emini Down from the Highs Still within the Range Jan 17
Tue, Jan 17, 11:31 AM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

In the battle for market dominance we still DON’T have a winner! Bulls? Bears? Still ...

Still Range Trading at the Highs January 13 Update
Fri, Jan 13, 1:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

In the battle for market dominance we still DON’T have a winner! Bulls? Bears? Nada. ...

Volatility Returns to the Emini January 12
Thu, Jan 12, 1:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Buyers and sellers continue to struggle for dominance at the highs and right now neither ...

From the Highs Back to our First Fibonacci Level Jan 11
Wed, Jan 11, 2:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

I always find it fascinating when price does exactly what it’s supposed to do – ...

Crude Oil Crushes Lower as Expected from Divergences
Tue, Jan 10, 6:51 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Crude Oil gives us a textbook example of a reversal pattern – with negative divergences ...

Hey Look at that Emini Range January 10
Tue, Jan 10, 3:11 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Bull Trap? Breakout? Both bulls and bears and fighting for dominance… and neither side is ...

Emini Playing Again at the Highs January 9
Mon, Jan 9, 1:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Monday morning may be the beginning of a “bull trap” should price remain under the ...

Through the Highs We Go January 6
Fri, Jan 6, 1:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Not to be outdone by this pesky sideways trading range, the stock market broke out ...

Something Strange in Sector Relative Strength Jan 5
Thu, Jan 5, 4:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

What signal is money flow across sectors sending, and what’s strange about it? Let’s take ...

A New Emini Range at the Highs January 5
Thu, Jan 5, 2:31 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

The market has a bullish beginning to 2017 but right now, we’re seeing a return ...

VIX ETPs Flash Some Green in 2016
Wed, Jan 4, 4:11 PM ET, by Bill Luby

Last year I shocked quite a few investors and media outlets with the publication of ...

Join Us Live TODAY to Plan your 2017 with Corey and Wyckoff Analytics
Wed, Jan 4, 1:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Let’s start 2017 on the right pathway! I’m honored to join Roman Bogomazov and Bruce ...

The Crude Oil Extraordinary Engulfing Day Jan 4
Wed, Jan 4, 12:41 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Bullish or Bearish Engulfing Candles are rare in general, but it’s even more exceptional to ...

The Emini Surge Back to the Highs January 4
Wed, Jan 4, 12:21 PM ET, by Corey Rosenbloom

Stocks surged again, continuing the 2017 rally. We saw another bounce off our Fibonacci Grid ...

  More articles:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next »


Volatility During Crises | Self Directed Investor | Copyright © 2008 - 2017, All Rights Reserved

Any ideas and opinions presented in Self Directed Investor content are for informational and educational purposes only, and do not reflect the opinions of BNK Invest, Inc. or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or partners. In no way should any content contained herein be interpreted to represent trading or investment advice. None of the information contained herein constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. All site visitors agree that under no circumstances will BNK Invest, Inc,. its subsidiaries, partners, officers, employees, affiliates, or agents be held liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information obtained. Read Full Disclaimer.

SDI is associated with: -- a subscription-based online social networking forum of serious individual investors. | -- videos appearing on SDI are produced by Market News Video. | -- stock quote content appearing on SDI is at least 20 minutes delayed and is powered by Ticker Technologies. | -- Edited by Scott V. Nystrom, PhD, Gold Stock Strategist provides analysis on gold mining companies.