Self Directed Investor Inc
SDI: "Empowering investors with ideas and education"
Symbol Lookup »  
Topics:ChinaETFsEarningsEconomyEnergyForexGoldIncomeLessonsIdeasTrading

  • Other news: News from PR Newswire
| More

$105,637 for Me, $80 for You!

Tue, Mar 27, 6:46 PM ET, by ilene, Sabrient.com

$105,637 for Me, $80 for You!

By Phil of Phil’s Stock World

Isn’t this economy FANTASTIC?

It sure is for those of us in the top 1% (1.4M) - people earning over $352,000 in annual income. We made $105,637 more Dollars in 2010 than we did in 2009 – thanks in large part to the Fed’s fantastic policy of printing more and more money, which lets us borrow cheaply or invest with leverage in inflating equity as the Dollar collapses.

Sure the Dollar collapsing hurts everyone – but an extra $105,637 keeps us ahead of inflation, right?

I’m still jealous of course (good Capitalists are always jealous), as the top .01% (14,000 people) – who earn an average of $23.8M, were able to add another $4.2M to their annual incomes in 2010. That’s 52,500 TIMES the average $80 increase earned by the bottom 99% (thank goodness we’re not one of THEM!).

That’s right, somehow, the riff-raff in the bottom 99% managed to grab 7% of the Nation’s total increase in income – clearly Congress needs to make immediate changes to prevent this travesty from happening again!

Steve Rattner has a different opinion, saying: “The only way to redress the income imbalance is by implementing policies that are oriented toward reversing the forces that caused it. That means letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthy and adding money to some of the programs that House Republicans seek to cut. Allowing this disparity to continue is both bad economic policy and bad social policy. We owe those at the bottom a fairer shot at moving up.”

That’s Commie talk! If we allow the bottom 99% to make a fair share of the money, they would make 5% more and you know they would only SPEND it on stuff they need TO LIVE. Then our companies would have to provide more goods and services to the bottom 99% and jobs would be created and we, at the top, would have to WAIT for the money to trickle UP from the bottom as only companies that do a good job servicing the bottom 99% would increase in value.

Even worse, we may have to WORK (a four-letter word) to provide goods and services for the people who have money in order to EARN (another four-letter word) our Incomes. That’s no fun for us at all!

We like it when we get ALL the money and we create just the jobs we choose by buying really expensive cars or really expensive homes or really expensive ($8.50) burritos at CMG because you know an $8.50 burrito creates more jobs than four $2 burritos that poor people would buy at Taco Bell – it’s a Rich Person’s FACT!

My $1M, 6,000 square-foot home created 2 more jobs than the standard $250,000 2,000 square foot home and sure, you could argue that 4 could have been built instead of one for the same price and that 16 people could have been housed instead of 4 and – oops, what was my point going to be???

chartOf course it’s not just flesh and blood people in the top 1% that hog all the income – top 1% Corporations are also choking off the bottom 99% by sucking up all the money.

On the right, there’s a chart that illustrates how AAPL has GAINED 8% in earnings since Jan 2011 while the ENTIRE rest of the Technology sector has LOST 3% as a group.

AAPL employs 60,400 people while the rest of the sector employs (employed) millions but, to be fair to AAPL, it probably employ millions of Chinese people, so it’s all good somewhere on the planet.

The fact that the bottom 99% of the Nasdaq 100 is actually going DOWN in earnings per share doesn’t stop investors from taking the AAPLdaq to fresh highs for the century but we’re bearish on the Nasdaq because we feel that IF AAPL falters, the crash is going to be SPECTACULAR. Even if AAPL does well, what happens when the sheeple who sampeded into tech get the Q1 earnings reports and discover that AAPL is one of the only positive stories out there?

Last year, the Nasdaq rebalanced AAPL from 20% of the index down to 12% of the index but now AAPL is almost back to 20% again, as it completely shreds all competion and grabs up those consumer Dollars before they can accidentally trickle anywhere else. Even in the S&P 500, AAPL is now 3.8% of the index, well ahead of #2 XOM (3.3%) and #3 MSFT (1.9%). AAPL’s 33% gain (so far) has boosted the Nasdaq and the QQQs 16.6% and added 9.6% to the entire S&P 500.

The problem has become so acute that several major analysts are delivering clients two sets of market reports, one with Apple included and one “ex-Apple.” The chief equity strategist at UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) creates two versions of his S&P 500 outlook reports; so do analysts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), Barclay’s Capital, Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS). For example, they point out that the S&P’s fourth quarter 6.6% rise would have been only a 2.8% gain ex-Apple (reflecting Apple’s 40% gain since Thanksgiving) and profit margin growth, which registered a 0.05% gain in the fourth quarter, would have actually been a negative 2.2% ex-Apple.

Oh well, that’s Capitalism, isn’t it?

AAPL does to bottom 99% of the Nasdaq what any top 1%’er does to the bottom 99% of the American people - they make more and more while the bottom 99% make less and less, or work harder just to stay in place.

As long as you look at the WHOLE basket – it looks like things are getting better for the group – only a closer examination shows you how disparate the incomes of the top and the bottom have become over time.

Of course things seem just fine if you are in the top 1% and they can only get ”better” if you make more money and that means – very simply – less for the bottom 99%. When do we have the ideal amount? When we have 100% and the bottom 99% has zero? We already have 25% and in 2010 we captured 56% of the income gains so our diproportionate share is, indeed, growing even more disproportionate every year.

Don’t you think we should have a stated goal for how little we want the bottom 99% to have? We’ve already put them below the 50% line that held in the great depression.

Actually, there’s a funny story there because the bottom 99%’s share of the income bottomed out in 1927 and that was 3 years BEFORE the US Economy collapsed. One might say we over-did it back then as the resulting Depression impacted the incomes of the top 1% as well but, as noted above, the top 1% have their own top 1% and, every once in a while, it’s good to purge the bottom 99% of the top 1% because those 14,000 people have never had it so good.

While the bottom 99% may complain that they only got 7% of the income gains in 2010 – the bottom 99% of the top 1% also got screwed, capturing just 1/3 of the gains for 1.4M while the top 14,000 took 66% of the pie.

Just like in 1927, the stock market is roaring as the rich get richer and trickle their increased earnings into stocks and commodities, with commodities being the most fun as rich people get to buy things they don’t need like bars of gold or tankers full of oil. They SPECULATE that the prices will go up.

Of course, when people who don’t need a commodity take large quantities of the commodity out of circulation with no intent to consume it – they create an artificial shortage that drives the price of that commodity higher – it’s BRILLIANT!

jm041709image002

It ends very badly, but what a ride! No one wants to miss out on the rally, regardless of the consequences and the top 1% have LOTS of money to throw into the markets and, when your income jumps 20% a year - you do tend to want to toss a little more cash into the market and that’s how “hot” money flows in.

That then is followed by what Guy Lerner refers to as the “dumb money,” – four groups of investors who his­tor­i­cally have been wrong on the mar­ket: 1) Investors Intel­li­gence; 2) Mar­ket­Vane; 3) Amer­i­can Asso­ci­a­tion of Indi­vid­ual Investors; and 4) the put call ratio. This indi­ca­tor shows extreme bull­ish­ness.

As stated by Lerner last week: "If we look at the "dumb money" indi­ca­tor in fig­ure 1, we know that as long as the indi­ca­tor stays above the upper band (see green arrow on chart), prices should con­tinue to go higher albeit in a grind­ing fash­ion at this stage of the rally.

I had made a similar observation in Friday’s post, saying anything other than a move up into Friday’s end of quarter would make us very bearish. We had added some bullish plays in expectations of this but yesterday’s move up was so sharp that we took the opportunity to press a few bear side bets – just in case we don’t get another crack at yesterday’s highs.

If we do head higher into the week’s end, we still plan to short some more – and if the markets do hold up into April, we’ll be happy to capitulate and add more bullish trades but, for now – I’m just not seeing the internals to support these levels.

We’ve exhausted our 10 Bullish Trade Ideas from our 3/14 post and we took the 50% profit and ran after just 2 months on our “One Trade for 2012” (BAC) - although some of our trade ideas are still playable and will do very well if Bernanke comes through with April QE3 but now we’re going to look at MORE AGGRESSIVE trade ideas if our new 13,200 goal on the Dow holds up along with 1,420 on the S&P (our 2.5% line). We keep pressing our levels because - IF this is a real bull market driven by underlying inflation and Fed money printing – then we expect it to go up and up and up. Any signs of faltering should immediately turn us more cautious – you DO NOT want to be the last man to leave this Ship of Fools if it starts to sink.

So we, in the top 1%, don’t fear inflation – nor do we fear a devaluation of our currency because we get to borrow that currency cheaply and leverage it up into massive gains against relatively small moves in the market and, best of all – we get to pay the bottom 99% people the same wages we paid last year, perhaps even with less benefits, using that rapidly devaluing currency in exhange for your increasingly productive labor. No wonder Corporate Profits are at record highs (even if it is just the top 1% of Corporations)…

God bless Capitalism!


SDI Glossary: "Bullish" Definition
SDI Glossary: "price" Definition
SDI Glossary: "the Fed" Definition
SDI Glossary: "NYSE" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Stock" Definition
SDI Glossary: "TA" Definition
This Article's Word Cloud:   AAPL   Apple   NYSE   Nasdaq   That   because   been   bottom   commodity   course   earnings   four   from   gain   gains   going   good   have   income   indi   inflation   into   jobs   just   less   like   make   market   money   more   only   people   policy   share   some   still   than   that   there   they   this   those   very   well   what   when   while   with   would   year

| More

Sector Detector: Santa tries to "sleigh" the fiscal cliff
Thu, Dec 13, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Dark Horse Traders' Hedge: It's Been a Long Way Down For Apple
Wed, Dec 12, 6:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Historical Tax Rates Provide Clarity
Mon, Dec 10, 8:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sabrient and Gradient Release Earnings Quality Rank (EQR), a New Quantitative Tool
Mon, Dec 10, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Tech shows best valuations as budget negotiation continues
Thu, Dec 6, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Scott Brown to Reveal Sabrient's Top Stocks on BNN
Wed, Dec 5, 2:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Shame on Washington!
Mon, Dec 3, 6:46 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Big Unemployment Numbers Across the Pond Remains the Big EU News
Mon, Dec 3, 1:46 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Rankings stay neutral while charts take a bullish turn
Thu, Nov 29, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: From Rush to Risk to Worry
Mon, Nov 26, 6:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Britain Adds More Drama to the EU Circus
Mon, Nov 26, 10:56 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: A $64 Trillion Dilemma
Mon, Nov 19, 6:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: A Short Week On Wall Street Might Be a Good Week to Go Short
Mon, Nov 19, 5:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Jaded public needs a new hero
Wed, Nov 14, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sabrient's Equity Valuation and Ranking Now Available on Bloomberg's App Portal
Tue, Nov 13, 11:45 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: The Devil You Know
Mon, Nov 12, 7:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Dark Horse Traders' Hedge: Ride out the Storm with FCX, Option Review
Mon, Nov 12, 7:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Bad Economic Numbers Mean a Good Time to Short the Eurozone
Mon, Nov 12, 3:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Focus returns to corporate earnings and Europe
Thu, Nov 8, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: After Tomorrow, Another Uncertainty Bites The Dust
Mon, Nov 5, 8:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Elections the Flame, Wall Street the Moth
Mon, Nov 5, 1:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks attempt to launch a pre-election rally
Fri, Nov 2, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Frankenstorm Scares the Markets Closed
Wed, Oct 31, 6:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Frankenstorm!
Mon, Oct 29, 7:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: With Companies Sitting On Massive Cash, Expect Blisters On Bottom Lines
Mon, Oct 29, 12:55 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks can't overcome weak quarterly reports
Thu, Oct 25, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Looking for Certainty Amidst Uncertainty
Mon, Oct 22, 7:25 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Watch Out Below If Earnings Disappoint This Week
Mon, Oct 22, 2:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks back in rally mode even without Tech leadership
Thu, Oct 18, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Uncertainty Reigns in the Market
Mon, Oct 15, 6:53 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Eurozone and Earnings Duke It Out for This Week's Market Mover Title
Mon, Oct 15, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Earnings season launches under cloud of low expectations
Thu, Oct 11, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Jobs, Food Stamps, Conspiracies (Market Shadows' Fun With Numbers)
Tue, Oct 9, 4:56 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Glimpse into the Future (Market Shadows' Fun With Numbers)
Tue, Oct 9, 4:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Fasten Your Money Belts
Mon, Oct 8, 8:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Ride Sally Ride (SLM) in Option Review, Add Cooper Tire (CTB)
Mon, Oct 8, 7:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Ladies and Gentlemen, Start Your Earnings Season
Mon, Oct 8, 10:56 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Bulls keep their powder dry as presidential debates begin
Thu, Oct 4, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Fly to Safety (and not on American Airlines)
Mon, Oct 1, 7:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Options Trade on GBX and MIPS
Mon, Oct 1, 12:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Spain Remains a Pain For Wall Street
Mon, Oct 1, 11:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

5 Stocks Billionaires Are Crazy About
Fri, Sep 28, 12:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Investors Watch Romney's Hunt for Red October
Thu, Sep 27, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Broken Mirrors
Tue, Sep 25, 9:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Caution is the Word of the Week
Mon, Sep 24, 7:25 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

David Brown Quoted in MarketWatch Article
Mon, Sep 24, 1:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Is Wall Street Floating Along On An Equity Bubble?
Mon, Sep 24, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks finally break out from 3-month rising channel
Thu, Sep 20, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: QE3 can Likely Produce 10% Short-term Gain
Mon, Sep 17, 5:55 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Bernanke's Open End Bond Purchases May Snag at the Fiscal Cliff
Mon, Sep 17, 11:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

  More articles:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next »

ABOUT US »   ADVERTISE »   CONTACT US »   TERMS OF USE & PRIVACY POLICY »

$105,637 for Me, $80 for You! | Self Directed Investor | Copyright © 2008 - 2014, All Rights Reserved

Any ideas and opinions presented in Self Directed Investor content are for informational and educational purposes only, and do not reflect the opinions of BNK Invest, Inc. or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or partners. In no way should any content contained herein be interpreted to represent trading or investment advice. None of the information contained herein constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. All site visitors agree that under no circumstances will BNK Invest, Inc,. its subsidiaries, partners, officers, employees, affiliates, or agents be held liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information obtained. Read Full Disclaimer.

SDI is associated with: ValueForum.com -- a subscription-based online social networking forum of over 1000 individual investors. | MarketNewsVideo.com -- videos appearing on SDI are produced by Market News Video. | TickerTech.com -- stock quote content appearing on SDI is at least 20 minutes delayed and is powered by Ticker Technologies. | GoldStockStrategist.com -- Edited by Scott V. Nystrom, PhD, Gold Stock Strategist provides analysis on gold mining companies.