Self Directed Investor Inc
SDI: "Empowering investors with ideas and education"
Symbol Lookup »  
Topics:ChinaETFsEarningsEconomyEnergyForexGoldIncomeLessonsIdeasTrading

  • Other news: News from PR Newswire
| More

Why is Overstock.com obstructing California District Attorney's investigation into allegations of consumer fraud?

Tue, Apr 12, 2:45 PM ET, by Sam E. Antar, Sabrient.com

Why is Overstock.com obstructing California District Attorney's investigation into allegations of consumer fraud?

Updated at 2:09 PM ET

by Sam E. Antar

On November 17, 2010, District Attorneys from seven California counties sued Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) alleging that the company has engaged in fraudulent pricing practices after a two year investigation. The lawsuit alleged that:

9. Beginning on a date no later than January 1, 2006, Overstock routinely and systematically made untrue and misleading comparative advertising claims about the prices of its products.

[Snip]

11. ... Overstock used various misleading measures to inflate the comparative prices, and thus artificially increase the discounts it claimed to be offering consumers.

[Snip]

22. Often Overstock has not been determining or verifying the price other merchants charge for those identical products. Rather, Overstock has been using various misleading methods to make up its own "straw-man" prices which it claims other merchants are charging for those products, and then claiming that its own prices are significantly lower.

23. Overstock has advertised comparative prices which do not exist (i.e., simply making up the prices charged by other merchants).

The district attorneys are seeking at least $15 million of restitution, fines, penalties, and cost reimbursements from Overstock.com for allegedly defrauding consumers. (Download a copy of the lawsuit).

Overstock.com obstructing and stonewalling California District Attorney investigation of alleged consumer fraud

On April 1, 2011, the District Attorney of Alameda County filed a motion to compel Overstock.com to turn over the present or last known contact information for certain former employees with knowledge of alleged fraudulent pricing practices (Download a copy of motion here):

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on May 5, 2011, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in Department 20 of the Alameda County Superior Court, Plaintiff, People of the State of California (hereinafter "The People") will and do hereby move, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2030.300, for an order compelling defendant Overstock.com, Inc. (hereafter "Overstock" or "Defendant" to provide further responses to the People's First Set of Interrogatories to Overstock.

Specifically, the People will and do hereby move for an order compelling Overstock.com to further respond to Special Interrogatories 8 and 14 by providing current contact information for the former employees whose names Overstock disclosed in response to these Interrogatories.

The People met and conferred via email in good faith in an attempt to informally resolve this dispute and have offered to enter into a protective order as a means of satisfying Overstock.com's asserted privacy objections. Nevertheless, Overstock.com has refused to provide the People with the information sought. [Emphasis added.]

Further, the District Attorney’s motion to compel states:

Included in these interrogatories was a request for the name of each former employee, and their “present or last known address, telephone number, e-mail address, present or last known telephone number, and present or last known cell number.

[Snip]

…rather than provide current contact information, Overstock.com listed its corporate address and telephone number, even though the individuals in question were by definition former employees. [Emphasis added.]

Rick Koerber, who is under indictment for alleged Ponzi scheme, with Patrick Byrne

In law enforcement circles, there is a term known as the "three exes" for ex-lovers, ex-employees, and ex-business associates. In many cases, such informants provide crucial information to law enforcement agencies that investigate and prosecute white-collar crime.

Apparently, Overstock.com is afraid because the Alameda County District Attorney wants to directly contact ex-employees with possible knowledge of alleged wrongdoing without going through the company as a go-between. That’s why Overstock.com only provided the District Attorney its own address and phone number as contact information for its former employees, rather than turnover to them the present or last known addresses of those former employees.

Overstock.com is trying to make the District Attorney contact those ex-employees through the company, rather than letting the District Attorney directly contact those ex-employees. In other words, Overstock.com wants to know in advance exactly who the California District Attorney is going to talk to.

Since the District Attorney offered “offered to enter into a protective order as a means of satisfying Overstock.com's asserted privacy objections” it seems that the company is using the privacy issue as a ruse. It appears that Overstock.com is using the privacy issue as a pretext to thwart the District Attorney’s investigation into alleged wronging by the company.

In any case, the company has no sense of irony when it comes to privacy. It has no issue invading the privacy of company critics, bloggers, journalists, and their families – their minor children included.

Overstock.com invades the privacy of company critics, bloggers, journalists, and their families – minor children included.

In 2009, I identified certain violations of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) by Overstock.com that allowed it to fabricate a Q4 2008 profit rather than a properly reported loss. I sent emails to Overstock.com and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alerting them about the company's illegal accounting practices. I urged the company to restate its financial reports to correct its improper accounting practices. Instead of properly complying with GAAP, Overstock.com continued to overstate income in Q1, Q2, and Q3 2009. The company even fired Grant Thornton as its auditor for agreeing with my recommendations.

In September 2009, the SEC started investigating Overstock.com. In March 2010, Overstock.com finally admitted that it violated GAAP and restated its financial reports to correct its violations, as I recommended a year earlier.

CEO Patrick Byrne personally attacked me on a stock market chat board, during various earnings calls, and in the press in an effort to discredit me. Byrne even hired internet stalker Judd Bagley to interfere with my divorce and pretext my children and relatives on Facebook after I pointed out the company’s accounting violations.

According to best-selling author and TheStreet.com columnist Gary Weiss:

Bagley created “Larry Bergman” and an unknown number of phony Facebook accounts to con people into “friending” him. That way he could circumvent Facebook security, violating their rules and, well, Lord knows how many laws he broke in this pretexting scheme.

Judd Bagley looks creepy, too.
The company’s pretexting operation also targeted dozens of other journalists, bloggers, critics, and their minor children, too. Attorney and Big Picture blogger (over 50,000 daily readers) Barry Rithholtz called Judd Bagley a “possible pedarast.” Ritholtz’s family was spied on, too. Eventually, Facebook booted Bagley for violating its rules.

In Patrick Byrne's deluded mind, apparently Bagley seemed like the right stalker for the job of preying on the minor children of Overstock.com critics and journalists. Back in 2002, Judd Bagley was the spokesman for Kevin Garn who lost a primary election to Rob Bishop for the Republican nomination in Utah’s 1st Congressional District. Kevin Garn admitted that around 1984 he shared a hot tub with a nude 15-year-old minor girl while he was 29 or 30-years-old. Years later, during his 2002 unsuccessful campaign for Congress Garn paid her $150,000 in hush money to keep her quiet.

On March 13, 2010, the Huffington Post reported that Kevin Garn:

…resigned from the Legislature Saturday, two days after acknowledging he paid a woman $150,000 to keep quiet about a nude hot-tubbing incident that took place a quarter century ago when she was a teenager."

[Snip]

Garn told colleagues he paid the woman, Cheryl Maher, after she began contacting reporters about the incident during his unsuccessful bid for a congressional seat in 2002. Despite a confidentiality agreement, the now 40-year-old Maher began contacting local news media last week to retell her story about being naked with Garn when she was 15, he said Thursday. [Emphasis added.]

Apparently, the nauseating Judd Bagley likes to work for bosses like Patrick Byrne and Kevin Garn who have no qualms about preying on innocent minor children.


Google busts Overstock.com for cheating

Patrick Byrne while intoxicated

In February 2011, Google penalized Overstock.com for improperly gaming its search algorithm to boost its search rankings. On April 8, 2011, Overstock.com filed an 8-K report and disclosed:

As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, on February 22, 2011, Google Inc. notified us that it was penalizing us in natural search results for noncompliance with some of Google's natural search guidelines. As a result, we have dropped significantly in some Google natural search result rankings. In our Form 10-K, we stated our belief that the Google penalty period might last between two to four weeks, and our estimate that the lower Google natural search rankings may have as much as a 5% negative impact on our revenue during the penalty period.

While we have removed or, in the case where we do not have access, requested removal of all of the questionable links of which we are aware and of which Google has informed us, at the date of this filing, Google is not yet fully satisfied and continues to penalize us in natural search results. We now estimate that it will be at least another two to three weeks before Google will end the penalty period. During the penalty period to date, we have experienced an approximately 5% negative impact on our revenue, which we anticipate will continue during the penalty period. [Emphasis added.]

Last year, Overstock.com reported $264.33 million of revenues for Q1 2010. A “5% negative impact on revenue” during the Google penalty period translates into approximately $13 million of lost revenues assuming the penalty period lasts for three months based on the previous year’s revenues. Based on Overstock.com’s disclosure above, the penalty period is expected to last only nine weeks: from February 22, 2011 to the end of April or early May. Therefore, the negative impact on revenues can be calculated at roughly $9 million.


Update on current SEC investigation

The SEC continues to investigate securities law violations by Overstock.com. In its 2010 10-K report, the company disclosed that the SEC is now looking into its allowances for sales returns:

On June 11, 2010 we received a comment letter from the staff of the SEC issued with respect to the staff’s review of, among other filings, our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In addition to other comments, the staff’s June 11, 2010 letter included comments requesting additional information and disclosures regarding our allowance for sales returns. We responded to the staff’s comments, and after additional correspondence, the staff informed us by letter dated August 23, 2010 that the staff had no further comments at that time. [Emphasis added.]

I contacted the SEC and suggested that they take a second look at Overstock.com’s June 2010 responses, based on certain information I supplied them. Overstock.com disclosed that:

On December 13, 2010 we received a comment letter from the staff issued with respect to the staff’s review of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. In addition to other comments, the staff’s December 13, 2010 letter included comments requesting additional information regarding our allowance for sales returns and referenced one of our responses to their letter dated June 11, 2010 about sales returns. We have responded to the staff’s December 13, 2010 comments, but the staff’s comments about our sales returns allowance remain unresolved at the date of this filing. We continue to work with the staff to address their open comments. [Emphasis added.]

From December 31, 2007, Overstock.com's sales returns allowances declined from $24.326 million to $11.923 million at December 31, 2010 while annual revenues rose from $765.9 million in 2007 to $1.09 billion in 2010. Usually, sales returns grow with revenues, but in the case of Overstock.com, they declined as revenues increased. Apparently, the SEC is examining whether Overstock.com improperly inflated its sales returns allowance in prior years to create an illegal “cookie jar reserve” and gradually reduced that reserve in later years to improperly inflate its profits.

Written by:

Sam E. Antar


SDI Glossary: "price" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Exchange" Definition
SDI Glossary: "GAAP" Definition
SDI Glossary: "Generally Accepted Accounting Principles " Definition
SDI Glossary: "NASDAQ" Definition
SDI Glossary: "TA" Definition
This Article's Word Cloud:   Attorney   Bagley   Byrne   California   December   District   Emphasis   Garn   Google   Overstock   People   about   added   after   alleged   children   comments   company   contact   during   employees   former   from   have   information   into   known   last   letter   million   minor   natural   number   other   penalty   period   prices   privacy   returns   revenues   sales   search   staff   than   that   their   those   will   with   year

| More

Sector Detector: Santa tries to "sleigh" the fiscal cliff
Thu, Dec 13, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Dark Horse Traders' Hedge: It's Been a Long Way Down For Apple
Wed, Dec 12, 6:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Historical Tax Rates Provide Clarity
Mon, Dec 10, 8:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sabrient and Gradient Release Earnings Quality Rank (EQR), a New Quantitative Tool
Mon, Dec 10, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Tech shows best valuations as budget negotiation continues
Thu, Dec 6, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Scott Brown to Reveal Sabrient's Top Stocks on BNN
Wed, Dec 5, 2:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Shame on Washington!
Mon, Dec 3, 6:46 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Big Unemployment Numbers Across the Pond Remains the Big EU News
Mon, Dec 3, 1:46 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Rankings stay neutral while charts take a bullish turn
Thu, Nov 29, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: From Rush to Risk to Worry
Mon, Nov 26, 6:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Britain Adds More Drama to the EU Circus
Mon, Nov 26, 10:56 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: A $64 Trillion Dilemma
Mon, Nov 19, 6:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: A Short Week On Wall Street Might Be a Good Week to Go Short
Mon, Nov 19, 5:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Jaded public needs a new hero
Wed, Nov 14, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sabrient's Equity Valuation and Ranking Now Available on Bloomberg's App Portal
Tue, Nov 13, 11:45 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: The Devil You Know
Mon, Nov 12, 7:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Dark Horse Traders' Hedge: Ride out the Storm with FCX, Option Review
Mon, Nov 12, 7:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Bad Economic Numbers Mean a Good Time to Short the Eurozone
Mon, Nov 12, 3:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Focus returns to corporate earnings and Europe
Thu, Nov 8, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: After Tomorrow, Another Uncertainty Bites The Dust
Mon, Nov 5, 8:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Elections the Flame, Wall Street the Moth
Mon, Nov 5, 1:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks attempt to launch a pre-election rally
Fri, Nov 2, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Frankenstorm Scares the Markets Closed
Wed, Oct 31, 6:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Frankenstorm!
Mon, Oct 29, 7:15 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: With Companies Sitting On Massive Cash, Expect Blisters On Bottom Lines
Mon, Oct 29, 12:55 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks can't overcome weak quarterly reports
Thu, Oct 25, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Looking for Certainty Amidst Uncertainty
Mon, Oct 22, 7:25 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Watch Out Below If Earnings Disappoint This Week
Mon, Oct 22, 2:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks back in rally mode even without Tech leadership
Thu, Oct 18, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Uncertainty Reigns in the Market
Mon, Oct 15, 6:53 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Eurozone and Earnings Duke It Out for This Week's Market Mover Title
Mon, Oct 15, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Earnings season launches under cloud of low expectations
Thu, Oct 11, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Jobs, Food Stamps, Conspiracies (Market Shadows' Fun With Numbers)
Tue, Oct 9, 4:56 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Glimpse into the Future (Market Shadows' Fun With Numbers)
Tue, Oct 9, 4:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Fasten Your Money Belts
Mon, Oct 8, 8:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Ride Sally Ride (SLM) in Option Review, Add Cooper Tire (CTB)
Mon, Oct 8, 7:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Ladies and Gentlemen, Start Your Earnings Season
Mon, Oct 8, 10:56 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Bulls keep their powder dry as presidential debates begin
Thu, Oct 4, 8:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Fly to Safety (and not on American Airlines)
Mon, Oct 1, 7:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Options Trade on GBX and MIPS
Mon, Oct 1, 12:36 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Spain Remains a Pain For Wall Street
Mon, Oct 1, 11:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

5 Stocks Billionaires Are Crazy About
Fri, Sep 28, 12:35 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Investors Watch Romney's Hunt for Red October
Thu, Sep 27, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Broken Mirrors
Tue, Sep 25, 9:45 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: Caution is the Word of the Week
Mon, Sep 24, 7:25 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

David Brown Quoted in MarketWatch Article
Mon, Sep 24, 1:16 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Is Wall Street Floating Along On An Equity Bubble?
Mon, Sep 24, 11:16 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

Sector Detector: Stocks finally break out from 3-month rising channel
Thu, Sep 20, 8:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

What the Market Wants: QE3 can Likely Produce 10% Short-term Gain
Mon, Sep 17, 5:55 PM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

ETF Periscope: Bernanke's Open End Bond Purchases May Snag at the Fiscal Cliff
Mon, Sep 17, 11:15 AM ET, by Sabrient.com

. ...

  More articles:  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next »

ABOUT US »   ADVERTISE »   CONTACT US »   TERMS OF USE & PRIVACY POLICY »

Why is Overstock.com obstructing California District Attorney's investigation into allegations of consumer fraud? | Self Directed Investor | Copyright © 2008 - 2014, All Rights Reserved

Any ideas and opinions presented in Self Directed Investor content are for informational and educational purposes only, and do not reflect the opinions of BNK Invest, Inc. or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or partners. In no way should any content contained herein be interpreted to represent trading or investment advice. None of the information contained herein constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. All site visitors agree that under no circumstances will BNK Invest, Inc,. its subsidiaries, partners, officers, employees, affiliates, or agents be held liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information obtained. Read Full Disclaimer.

SDI is associated with: ValueForum.com -- a subscription-based online social networking forum of over 1000 individual investors. | MarketNewsVideo.com -- videos appearing on SDI are produced by Market News Video. | TickerTech.com -- stock quote content appearing on SDI is at least 20 minutes delayed and is powered by Ticker Technologies. | GoldStockStrategist.com -- Edited by Scott V. Nystrom, PhD, Gold Stock Strategist provides analysis on gold mining companies.